mph | pfx_x | pfx_z | |
Fastball | 93.2 | -6.9 | +9.0 |
Sinker | 93.1 | -9.9 | +5.2 |
Curveball | 75.7 | +7.0 | -7.5 |
Cutter | 90.3 | +0.7 | +5.6 |
Changeup | 87.6 | -8.8 | +2.5 |
Beckett gets less drop and velocity on the curve than Buchholz, and some extra tail and sink on the sinker. The biggest difference is the changeup - Buchholz's is slow and straight, while Beckett's just looks like a sinker with some velocity taken off. Generic pitch results:
# | % | RHB% | LHB% | Swing | Whiff | Zone | Chase | Watch | Ball | RV/100 | xRV/100 | |
Fastball | 801 | .379 | .331 | .411 | .439 | .139 | .472 | .255 | .354 | .356 | +1.18 | -0.82 |
Sinker | 340 | .161 | .187 | .143 | .453 | .123 | .435 | .313 | .365 | .388 | +1.10 | +0.46 |
Curveball | 385 | .182 | .226 | .153 | .348 | .291 | .384 | .257 | .507 | .436 | +0.32 | +0.09 |
Cutter | 347 | .164 | .207 | .136 | .602 | .273 | .435 | .443 | .216 | .308 | -0.12 | -1.31 |
Changeup | 242 | .114 | .050 | .158 | .459 | .306 | .339 | .313 | .256 | .434 | +0.14 | +0.74 |
2142 | .455 | .205 | .433 | .304 | .347 | .377 | +0.73 | -0.28 |
GB Rate | FB Rate | LD Rate | PU Rate | HR/FB | wOBAcon | |
Fastball | .444 | .375 | .153 | .028 | .148 | .479 |
Sinker | .513 | .167 | .244 | .077 | .154 | .392 |
Curveball | .491 | .200 | .255 | .055 | .182 | .400 |
Cutter | .426 | .265 | .191 | .118 | .167 | .439 |
Changeup | .523 | .250 | .182 | .045 | .182 | .315 |
.467 | .278 | .197 | .058 | .164 | .425 |
Beckett struck out over 8 men per 9 innings last year despite lacking a legitimate swing-and-miss pitch (though the cutter is impressive adjusted for pitch type - the average cutter has a whiff rate of around 21%). The chart below shows Beckett's pitch selection last year in each count. Hitters see plenty of curveballs in strikeout situations:
Overall: he got burned once the ball was in play last year (high wOBAcon, HR/FB, and RV-xRV), but he has some quality stuff. His cutter, in particular, looks good. He can probably still be quite effective this year if he stays healthy and has some more luck.
No comments:
Post a Comment